A Comparative Analysis of i*Agent-Oriented Modelling Techniques
نویسندگان
چکیده
Agent-oriented software engineering has become an extended practice. The autonomy and flexibility provided by agents makes it appropriate either for the development of agentbased systems and for the development of complex and distributed software systems. Due to this wide applicability there are many modelling languages and methodologies for representing and developing systems using the agent-oriented paradigm. Among them, the i* language is very appropriate, not only for the agent concepts that it models, but also for its capabilities in the disciplines of requirements engineering and organizational process modelling. Nowadays, i* is one of the most widespread notations used for these purposes, and agentoriented methodologies may take advantage of its existence in the requirements phase. However, due to the degree of freedom inherent to the i* language, the construction of the models may not be an easy task. To give light to this subject, we present several i* agent-oriented modelling techniques and we compare them according to a certain set of criteria.
منابع مشابه
A Comparative Analysis of i*-Based Agent-Oriented Modeling Languages
Agent-oriented models are frequently used in disciplines such as requirements engineering and organizational process modelling. i* is currently one of the most widespread notations used for this purpose. Due to its strategic nature, instead of a single definition, there exist several versions and variants, often not totally defined and even contradictory. In this paper we present a comparative ...
متن کاملComparative Analysis & Evaluation of Agent Oriented Methodologies Using Enhanced Feature Analysis Framework
The objective of this chapter is to provide an insight preview into various agent oriented methodologies by using an enhanced comparison framework based on criteria like process related criteria, steps and techniques related criteria, steps and usability criteria, model related or “concepts” related criteria, comparison regarding model related criteria and comparison regarding supportive relate...
متن کاملImproving comparative analysis for the evaluation of AOSE methodologies
Agent-oriented methodologies, as they have been proposed so far, mainly try to suggest a clean and disciplined approach to analyse, design and develop MASs by using specific methods and techniques. Moreover, different studies have been proposed for the evaluation of agent-oriented methodologies adopting specific types of evaluation and criteria. However, little effort has been devoted to the co...
متن کاملConsistency preserving co-evolution of formal specifications and agent-oriented conceptual models
Many modelling techniques tend to address ‘‘late-phase” requirements while many critical modelling decisions (such as determining the main goals of the system, how the stakeholders depend on each other, and what alternatives exist) are taken during early-phase requirements engineering. The i modelling framework is a semiformal agent-oriented conceptual modelling language that is well-suited for...
متن کاملExploring Gördes Zeolite Sites by Feature Oriented Principle Component Analysis of LANDSAT Images
Recent studies showed that remote sensing (RS) is an effective, efficient and reliable technique used in almost all the areas of earth sciences. Remote sensing as being a technique started with aerial photographs and then developed employing the multi-spectral satellite images. Nowadays, it benefits from hyper-spectral, RADAR and LIDAR data as well. This potential has widen its applicability in...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006